Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The effect of uraemia on the duration of arrhythmias in the context of cardioprotective ischaemic conditioning strategies
Free
  1. Kieran McCafferty,
  2. Conor J Byrne,
  3. Julius Kieswich,
  4. Martin Raftery,
  5. Christoph Thiemermann,
  6. Muhammad M Yaqoob
  1. Department of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kieran McCafferty, Department of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; kieranmccafferty{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background Sudden cardiac death is a leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease. Ischaemic conditioning strategies confer profound myocardial protection and, in the absence of uraemia, have been reported to reduce myocardial dysrhythmias. Recent data confirms that ischaemic conditioning can protect the uraemic heart. However, the effect of uraemia on myocardial arrhythmogenesis in the context of ischaemia-reperfusion injury and whether ischaemic conditioning can modulate this is unknown.

Objective We investigated the effect of underling chronic uraemia on the duration of arrhythmias in the context of cardioprotective ischaemic conditioning strategies.

Methods We examined the effect of chronic uraemia on arrhythmias occurring in the context of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury and the ability of ischaemic preconditioning (IPC), remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) and ischaemic postconditioning (iPOST) to suppress arrhythmogenesis in uraemic and non-uraemic animals.

Results IPC led to a reduction in the frequency and duration of arrhythmias occurring during ischaemia and reperfusion. Neither RIPC nor iPOST affected the duration or frequency of ischaemic or reperfusion arrhythmias. Underlying uraemia did not alter the frequency or duration of ischaemic arrhythmias in any of the experiments however it was associated with a reduction in reperfusion arrhythmia duration in the IPC and iPOST experiments.

Conclusions These studies demonstrate that underlying chronic uraemia does not reduce the threshold for arrhythmia timing or duration resulting from myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion and underlying uraemia did not alter the effects of these cardioprotective ischaemic conditioning strategies in the context of arrhythmia duration.

Summary This novel work in a rodent model of chronic uraemia establishes that underlying uraemia does not increase the susceptibility to myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion induced arrhythmias. When compared with the non-uraemic heart, the uraemic heart has a similar response to the effects of ischaemic conditioning strategies in terms of their effect on arrhythmia timing and duration.

  • Arrhythmias
  • Renal Disease

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.1 Sudden cardiac death/arrhythmia represents the most common cause of cardiovascular mortality in end stage renal disease, with 26% of deaths attributable to cardiac arrhythmias.1

Structural and functional abnormalities of the cardiovascular system such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), myocardial fibrosis, inflammation, sympathetic overactivity and electrolyte disturbances, along with a clustering of classical risk factors for arrhythmias such as old age, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes affect individuals with chronic uraemia to create a ‘perfect storm’ for cardiac dysrhythmias.1–5

Ischaemic conditioning strategies encompass a number of tissue protective techniques, described over the last quarter of a century. Ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) was described by Murry et al6 who reported that brief episodes of ‘sublethal’ ischaemia followed by reperfusion, could confer resistance to a subsequent lethal episode of ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Subsequently Przyklenk et al7 reported that vascular beds adjacent to the preconditioned territory were also rendered resistant to IRI and the term remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) was coined to describe this phenomenon. Lastly Zhao et al8 reported the phenomenon of ischaemic postconditioning (iPOST) whereby interruption of reperfusion by additional episodes of brief IRI led to a reduction in infarct size. In addition to their cytoprotective effect, the antiarrhythmic effect of IPC, RIPC and iPOST have also been investigated. IPC has been widely reported to reduce ischaemic9–11 and reperfusion9 ,12 arrhythmias in animals. The antiarrhythmic effect of IPC has also been replicated in humans.13–15 However not all groups have demonstrated a beneficial effect of IPC on arrhythmogenesis. Grund et al16 reported that IPC increased arrhythmias in pigs and Jebeli et al17 found that IPC did not suppress arrhythmias in a cohort of patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass (CABG).

RIPC also appears to suppress arrhythmias, however it is unclear whether RIPC suppresses only ischaemic arrhythmias,18 only reperfusion arrhythmias19 or both.20 ,21 iPOST has also been shown to reduce reperfusion arrhythmias in animals22 ,23 and humans.24

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been routinely excluded from clinical trials examining ischaemic conditioning induced cardioprotection. The impact of chronic uraemia on myocardial arrhythmias associated with IRI and the effect of ischaemic conditioning strategies on ischaemic and reperfusion arrhythmias in the uraemic heart are unknown. We analysed data on arrhythmia frequency and duration recorded during our previously published work on ischaemic conditioning in uraemic rats.25

Methods

All experiments were approved by our institutional ethics committee and performed under license granted by The Home Office (UK) in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Male Wistar rats were used for all experiments (Charles River Laboratories UK, Margate, UK).

Subtotal nephrectomy

Animals underwent a two-stage subtotal nephrectomy (SNx) or a sham procedure as previously described.25 The animals were allowed 4 weeks following the second stage (right total nephrectomy) to recover and develop the uraemic phenotype before undergoing myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion.

Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion

Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion was carried out as previously described.25 Briefly, animals were anaesthetised, a tracheostomy was performed and the animal ventilated using small animal ventilator. A venous and an arterial line were inserted, to monitor pulse and blood pressure.

Following a left parasternal incision a 6/0 silk suture was placed through the myocardium at the approximate level of the left anterior descending artery. A piece of polythene tubing was placed over the free ends of the suture to form a snare for reversible arterial occlusion.

Conditioning protocols

Ischaemic preconditioning

One or three cycles of 5 min left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion (ischaemia) was followed by 5 min reperfusion before either 25 min or 35 min of sustained ischaemia (figure 1).

Figure 1

Diagrammatic representation of the conditioning protocols.

Remote preconditioning

The left femoral artery was dissected out from the femoral vein and nerve. A microvessel clip was used to occlude the artery. Pallor and a reduction in the temperature of the paw confirmed occlusion. Reperfusion was confirmed by hyperaemia followed by restoration of normal colour and temperature. Three cycles of 5 min ischaemia followed by 5 min reperfusion were employed.

Postconditioning

LAD occlusion (ischaemia) for 25 min with five cycles of 10 s reperfusion/10 s ischaemia upon reperfusion was followed by a further 1 h 58 min and 20 s reperfusion (ie, 2 h reperfusion in total).

At the end of the final reperfusion period the animals were sacrificed and the heart harvested for determination of area at risk and infarct size (see our previous work25 for results of the tissue protective effects of myocardial conditioning strategies in the context of chronic uraemia).

Measurement of arrhythmias

During the experiments all animals had continuous monitoring of heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) using the Powerlab/85p system (ADInstruments).

Because the Powerlab/85p system displayed pressure waveforms for each heart beat, alterations in the MAP was used as a marker for the presence of arrhythmias. To confirm that alterations in the recorded MAP corresponded to arrhythmias, we performed contemporaneous ECG recordings (figure 2) on a subset of the animals (n=12). The 3-lead ECG recording was captured by attaching electrodes to the left and right sides of the chest wall along with the left footpad. These tracings were displayed in real time along with the blood pressure waveforms and heart rate through LabChart software. This confirmed that myocardial arrhythmias led to alterations in cardiac output, which was visible through beat-to-beat MAP waveforms.

Figure 2

ECG tracing (top), mean arterial pressure (MAP) trace (middle) and heart rate trace (bottom) recordings during experiments. (A) Preocclusion. ECG demonstrates sinus rhythm with normal ST segments. (B) 3 min into ischaemia. ECG demonstrates ST segment elevation; the MAP trace is preserved with a regular heart rate. (C) 5 min into ischaemia ventricular tachycardia develops with loss of cardiac output manifested by loss in MAP trace and heart rate.

For the purposes of analysis, an arrhythmia was defined as a haemodynamic disturbance in the MAP trace waveform lasting longer than 2 s. This time period was chosen so as to exclude occasional ectopic beats, which were unlikely to alter tissue perfusion.

Arrhythmias occurring during the first 30 s following LAD occlusion were excluded from analysis, as brief arrhythmias were not uncommon immediately after occlusion. These were often due to repositioning of the heart in the thoracic cavity using forceps to get good visualisation of the area at risk, rather than due to ischaemic arrhythmias.

The number and duration of arrhythmias (including cardiac arrest) occurring during the conditioning procedures, reperfusion or during the index ischaemia were recorded (figure 3). During the study, in response to a myocardial arrhythmia, no antiarrhythmic drugs were administered nor mechanical defibrillation manoeuvres performed.

Figure 3

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) trace (top) and heart rate (bottom) during 25 min of ischaemia and early reperfusion. Arrhythmias are noted by a transient drop in the MAP and alteration in heart rate occurring 5–8 min post occlusion, and again shortly after reperfusion.

Statistical analysis

Data was analysed with GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, California, USA). Given the non-normal distribution of the data set, non-parametric statistical analysis was used and the data are presented as median with IQR. A two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test with Dunn's postcomparison test were used to test for significance for all other experiments. In the RIPC and iPOST experiments, in addition to the Mann-Whitney U test, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-test comparison were employed to analyse the interaction of uraemia with the conditioning protocol.

Results

Characterisation of the uraemic phenotype

Four weeks following the second stage procedure, compared with sham operated animals, the uraemic animals were significantly growth restricted, hypertensive, anaemic and had an increased heart weight index (heart weight expressed as proportion of body weight); a surrogate for LVH (table 1). In addition the uraemic animals had over twice the serum creatinine and urea concentrations compared with sham operated animals (see online supplementary table for additional details on the characterisation of the model).

Table 1

Characterisation of the uraemic phenotype

Effect of three cycles of IPC on arrhythmia suppression in a model of chronic uraemia

Three cycles of IPC led to a subsequent reduction in the frequency and duration of ischaemic arrhythmias: the median duration in the non-preconditioned and preconditioned groups was 25 s and 2 s, respectively (p=0.003), with significantly fewer arrhythmias occurring in the preconditioned group (p<0.0001) (table 2). Three cycles of IPC also led to a reduction in the total duration and frequency of arrhythmias occurring after the 25-min ischaemia (reperfusion arrhythmias): median duration in the non-preconditioned and preconditioned groups was 9 s and 3 s, respectively (p=0.001), with significantly fewer arrhythmias occurring in the preconditioned group (p=0.01). The total duration of all ischaemic arrhythmias (calculated as the sum of the duration of arrhythmias occurring during the ischaemic phase of preconditioning and arrhythmias occurring during the 25 min ischaemia) was reduced by the IPC protocol (p=0.03). The total duration of reperfusion arrhythmias (calculated as the sum of the arrhythmias occurring during the reperfusion phases of IPC and those occurring after the 25 min ischaemia) was increased by IPC protocol (p=0.002), the increased reperfusion arrhythmias occurring during the IPC protocol meant that when all arrhythmias were considered together, the antiarrhythmic effect of IPC was lost (p=0.87). In a similar way, when the total number of arrhythmias (including those occurring during IPC) were considered, the overall apparent reduction in the frequency of arrhythmias in the IPC group was lost (p=0.09).

Table 2

The effect of three cycles of IPC on subsequent arrhythmia frequency and duration in a rodent model of chronic uraemia. SNx group (n=10) was compared with a SNx IPCx3 group (n=10).

Effect of underlying uraemia on arrhythmia suppression following a single IPC cycle

Underlying uraemia did not alter the effect of IPC on the duration of arrhythmias occurring during the ischaemic phase of preconditioning (p=0.23), or during (p=0.74), or after (p=0.64) the 35-min ischaemia period (table 3). However underlying uraemia was associated with a reduction in the duration of arrhythmias occurring during the reperfusion phase of preconditioning (p=0.02). This effect remained significant when the duration of all reperfusion arrhythmias (p=0.01) and all arrhythmias (ischaemic and reperfusion) were considered (p=0.02). When the frequency of arrhythmias was considered, underlying uraemia did not appear to alter the number of arrhythmias occurring during the preconditioning phase (p=0.37), the 25-min ischaemic phase (p=0.32) or the reperfusion phase (p=0.18).

Table 3

Table displaying the frequency and duration of arrhythmias (in seconds) between uraemic (SNx, n=10) and non-uraemic (Sham SNx, n=10) animals undergoing one cycle of IPC followed by myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion

Effect of RIPC on arrhythmias in uraemic and non-uraemic animals

RIPC had no significant effect on arrhythmia suppression in either uraemic or non-uraemic animals. There was no difference in the duration of ischaemic arrhythmias (p=0.74), reperfusion arrhythmias (p=0.5) or the total duration of all arrhythmias (p=0.54), nor was there any difference in the frequency of arrhythmias occurring during ischaemia (p=0.89) or reperfusion (p=0.64) (table 4). In addition no interaction was seen between underlying uraemia and RIPC in any of the above measurements using a two-way ANOVA.

Table 4

The effect of RIPC in uraemic and non-uraemic animals on the frequency and duration of arrhythmias

Effect of iPOST on arrhythmias in uraemic and non-uraemic animals

Unsurprisingly an iPOST protocol had no effect on the duration (p=0.36) or frequency (p=0.27) of ischaemic arrhythmias as the procedure was only commenced at the point of reperfusion (table 5). iPOST appeared to lead to an increase in the duration of reperfusion arrhythmias (p=0.05) however Dunn's post-test comparison between each group failed to show a significant difference. In addition iPOST did not alter the frequency of reperfusion arrhythmias (p=0.16). When each characteristic was analysed using a two-way ANOVA, no interaction was seen between uraemia and iPOST except in the total duration of reperfusion arrhythmias when uraemia appeared to be associated with a reduction in arrhythmia duration (p=0.04), which was independent of iPOST.

Table 5

The effect of iPOST in uraemic and non-uraemic animals on arrhythmia frequency and duration

Discussion

Our data confirms previous reports that IPC is associated with a resistance to subsequent ischaemic and reperfusion arrhythmias in the absence of uraemia.9–12 In addition we have shown for the first time that uraemia does not lead to a rise in frequency or duration of arrhythmia occurring during ischaemic conditioning strategies.

This study failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect on arrhythmogenesis from RIPC or iPOST in either uraemic or non-uraemic animals in spite of our previous work, which demonstrated a marked reduction in infarct size using both these strategies.25

In this study we defined an arrhythmia as an alteration in the beat-to-beat blood pressure waveform so we were unable to distinguish atrial from ventricular arrhythmias. This limitation meant that we were unable to apply the Lambeth convention for the study of arrhythmias.26 In addition it may be argued that the use of beat-to-beat haemodynamic parameters as a surrogate for ventricular arrhythmias may lead to a misdiagnosis of ventricular arrhythmias, however we confirmed, in a small subset of animals, using contemporaneous ECG recording that the arrhythmias classified using haemodynamic parameters were caused by a ventricular arrhythmia. While further electrocardiographic studies would be helpful in differentiating atrial from ventricular arrhythmias in the uraemic heart, it is the haemodynamically significant arrhythmias (classically ventricular in origin), which are responsible for the high rates of sudden cardiac death and it is these arrhythmias that we are able to capture using our technique.

Documentation of arrhythmias associated specifically during IPC protocols have not been well described in the published literature, with many reports concentrating on arrhythmias occurring during the standard ischaemia-reperfusion phase which occurred after the IPC protocol. When the arrhythmias associated with the preconditioning cycles were added to those occurring during the ischaemia-reperfusion phase the seemingly antiarrhythmic effect of IPC was lost, in terms of the absolute number of arrhythmias and their total duration. In light of this observation a novel way to describe the effects of IPC on myocardial arrhythmias would be that IPC shifts the arrhythmias forward in time from the lethal ischaemic and reperfusion phase to the IPC phase. Whether or not this change in the timing of arrhythmias has any direct effect on subsequent tissue protection is unclear. However hypotension resulting from ventricular arrhythmias occurring during IPC may be a part of the tissue protective signal. Indeed there have been several studies, which have shown tissue protection similar to IPC following episodes of temporary pacing27 ,28 or induction of ventricular fibrillation29 through demand ischaemia and loss of cardiac output, respectively. The additional benefit of these arrhythmias above and beyond the direct stimulation of the cytoprotective pathway by ischaemia in subsequent tissue protection is unknown. However this may explain the finding that IPC is a more potent cytoprotective strategy than either RIPC or iPOST which is borne out in our previous work which demonstrated that although there was no difference in the area at risk there was a relative reduction in infarct size of 86% in IPC, 59% in RIPC and 47% in iPOST.25 Arrhythmia generation from IPC is however unlikely to be the main trigger for subsequent tissue protection because IPC-induced arrhythmia suppression can be pharmacologically divorced from tissue protection10 ,30 and IPC is known to confer resistance to ischaemia in all the organs studied rather than just the myocardium.

The mechanism of arrhythmia suppression following ischaemic conditioning is not fully understood: it does not appear to be mediated by adenosine, bradykinin or prostaglandin30 or via depletion of endogenous catecholamines31 however there is evidence of involvement of the mitochondrial KATP channel and reactive oxygen species in the antiarrhythmic effects seen with IPC.32 Further work is required to investigate in detail the antiarrhythmic effects of IPC, RIPC and iPOST.

These results demonstrate that contrary to expectations uraemia did not lead to increased arrhythmia frequency or duration during myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion. Indeed our results suggest that underlying uraemia may lead to a reduction in reperfusion arrhythmia duration seen in the context of one cycle of IPC and during iPOST, but not during RIPC. However no statistically significant differences in arrhythmia frequency or duration were seen during the ischaemic phase. This finding is in contrast to epidemiological data, which report that uraemia is a risk factor for myocardial dysrhythmias leading to a high incidence of sudden cardiac death following a myocardial event.33

A potential explanation for this discrepancy could be that the four-week SNx model does not demonstrate the cardiac phenotype seen in patients with CKD. However this four-week model has been shown to develop hypertension,25 ,34 LVH,34 ,35 a reduced fractional shortening on echocardiography,36 impaired cardiac function secondary to bioenergetic failure,35 capillary rarefaction and myocardial interstitial cell proliferation37 leading to reduced ischaemia tolerance.25 ,34 Additionally even if the SNx model did not represent a severe uraemic phenotype, it is known that even mild to moderate CKD leads to a huge burden of cardiovascular disease: results from the HOPE study indicate that patients with moderate CKD (serum creatinine 125–200 μmol/L) had a 40% increase in sudden cardiac death when compared with individuals with normal renal function,,38 that patients with CKD stage 3 had an OR for cardiovascular events, of two to four compared patients with normal renal function and up to 40% of patients presenting with a myocardial infarction have mild to moderate renal failure.39

The increased incidence of sudden cardiac death in the CKD cohort could be explained by the increased incidence of acute myocardial events triggering arrhythmias and that the arrhythmias associated with sudden cardiac death are by definition ischaemic, rather than reperfusion driven and our data does not show any difference in ischaemia driven arrhythmia frequency or duration in the context of uraemia. An explanation for both the epidemiological data, which suggests that uraemia predisposes to malignant ventricular arrhythmias and our animal data, which found no increase in the susceptibility to ischaemic arrhythmias would be to conclude that that the increased incidence of cardiac dysrhythmias seen in people with CKD may be driven primarily by an increased incidence of ischaemic events rather than by an increase in the susceptibility to arrhythmias.

In conclusion these data demonstrate that, compared to a non-uraemic heart, the uraemic heart does not have a lower threshold severe arrhythmias and has a similar antiarrhythmic response to ischaemic conditioning strategies.

References

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • KM and CJB contributed equally to the body of work presented in this manuscript and are joint first authors.

  • Contributors KM, CJB, JK and MMY: Conception or design, or analysis and interpretation of data, or both. KM, CJB, JK, MR, CT and MMY: Drafting the article or revising it. KM, CJB, MR, CT and MMY: Providing intellectual content of critical importance to the work described. KM, CJB, JK, MR, CT and MMY: Final approval of the version to be published.

  • Funding Departmental.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.