Table 2

Trials comparing drug-eluting stent (DES) with CABG in diabetic subjects

TrialPatientsPrimary endpointInterventionResults
ARTS II27Diabetic patients treated with SES. Multivessel disease that included treatment of the left anterior descending artery and at least one other significant lesion (50% diameter stenosis) in another major epicardial coronary arteryMACCEThree-year clinical outcome was compared with that of the historical diabetic and non-diabetic arms of the randomised ARTS-I trialIn patients with diabetes, the incidence of MACCE in ARTS-II was similar to that of both PCI and CABG in ARTS-I. Conversely, the incidence of death, CVA and MI was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.65) and was similar to that of ARTS-I CABG
CARDIA37Diabetes. Multivessel CAD (two or more stenotic coronary or one in which PCI suitability is unclear.
Consensus between a cardiologist and surgeon that adequate revascularisation can be achieved
Death, non-fatal MI or stroke within 1 yearOptimal PCI includes the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, abciximab and SESs in all patients. Modern CABG: defined as one or more arterial conduit with a LIMA graft for the anterior native vessels and off-pump bypass at the surgical team’s discretionComposite rate of death, MI and stroke: 10.5% in the CABG group and 13.0% in the PCI group (HR 1.25, p=0.39), all-cause mortality rates: 3.2% and 3.2%. Rates of death, MI, stroke or repeat revascularisation were 11.3% and 19.3% (HR 1.77, p=0.02). CABG when compared with drug-eluting stents (69% of patients), the primary outcome rates were 12.4% and 11.6% (HR 0.93, p=0.82). Could not prove PCI non-inferiority
PRECOMBAT38Inclusion: LMCA stenosis ≥50% (visual estimate); angina or documented ischaemia amenable to both PCI or CABG; lesions outside LMCA amenable to both PCI or CABG. Exclusion: previous PCI (≥12 months); previous LMCA PCI; previous CABG; LVEF ≤20%; NYHA heart failure class III or IVAll-cause mortality, MI and stroke at 2 yearsRandomisation CABG vs PCI (30% diabetics)Primary end point: 36 patients in the PCI group as compared with 24 in the CABG group (cumulative event rate, 12.2% vs 8.1%; hazard ratio with PCI, 1.50; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.52; p=0.12).
Ischaemia-driven target-vessel revascularisation: 26 patients in the PCI group as compared with 12 patients in the CABG group (cumulative event rate, 9.0% vs 4.2%; HR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.10 to 4.32; p=0.02)
FREEDOM39Diabetes. Multivessel CAD (two or more lesions in major arteries), amenable to either PCI with DES or surgical revascularisation.All-cause mortality, MI and strokeCompared multivessel stenting using SESs with CABG superiority trialPrimary composite end point: PCI 26.6% vs CABG 18.7%, p value=0.005
Death from any cause: PCI 16.3% vs CABG 10.9%, p value=0.049
Myocardial infarction: PCI 13.9% vs CABG 6.0%, p value <0.001
Stroke: PCI 2.4% vs CABG 5.2%, p value=0.03
Cardiovascular death: PCI 10.9% vs CABG 6.8%, p value=0.12
  • ARTS, Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PCI, percutaneous coronary interventions; SES, sirolimus-eluting stent.