Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of total occlusion and high-grade stenosis in coronary CT angiography

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In coronary CT angiography (CTA), both high-grade stenoses and total occlusions of a coronary artery may appear as a complete interruption of the contrast-enhanced lumen. Parameters to differentiate between occlusions and stenoses have not been systematically assessed. We evaluated 40 consecutive patients with a lesion demonstrating complete interruption of the contrast-enhanced lumen in coronary CTA and in whom invasive coronary angiography was available. Length of the vessel segment without luminal contrast enhancement; luminal enhancement proximal, in and distal to the lesion; degree of coronary remodelling; and the degree of lesion calcification were assessed by a blinded observer unaware of the invasive angiogram. Mean length of complete occlusions (n = 20; range 4–54 mm; mean 16.6 ± 3.5 mm) was significantly longer than for high-grade stenoses (n = 20; 2–8 mm; mean 4.6 ± 1.7 mm, p < 0.001). A lesion length ≥ 9 mm was 100% specific and 70% sensitive for an occlusion. No significant differences were found for vessel enhancement in or distal to the lesion, remodelling index or degree of calcification. Lesion length is the only parameter that may differentiate complete occlusions and high-grade stenoses in coronary CTA. For lesions ≥ 9 mm, an occlusion is very likely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach S (2007) Cardiac CT: state of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis. JCCT 1:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferencik M, Ropers D, Abbara S et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology 243:696–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann MHK, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M et al (2005) Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 96:784–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268, Epub 2005 Dec 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B (2006) Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 178:600–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U et al (2000) Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823–2828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hausleitner J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poll LW, Cohne M, Brachten S et al (2002) Dose reduction in multislice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation (“ECG-pulsing”): phantom measurements. Rofo 174:1500–1505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experiance. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al (2006) Usefulness of multi-detector row spiral computed tomography with 64 × 0.6 mm collimation and 330 ms rotation fort he non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97:343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM et al (2006) Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 16:1964–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronray artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography—initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmid M, Pflederer T, Jang IK et al (2008) Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 197:457–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mollet NR, Hoye A, Lemos PA et al (2005) Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol 95:240–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. von Erffa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Erffa, J., Ropers, D., Pflederer, T. et al. Differentiation of total occlusion and high-grade stenosis in coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 18, 2770–2775 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1068-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1068-9

Keywords

Navigation