Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 349, Issue 9057, 5 April 1997, Pages 971-977
The Lancet

Articles
Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10488-8Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Drugs that improve symptoms in patients with heart failure must also be assessed for their effects on survival. Ibopamine stimulates DA-1 and DA-2 receptors and causes peripheral and renal vasodilatation; the drug improves symptoms of heart failure. We assessed the effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced heart failure in a multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled study.

Methods

Patients with advanced severe heart failure (New York Heart Association classes III and IV) and evidence of severe left-ventricular disease, who were already receiving optimum treatment for heart failure, were randomly allocated oral ibopamine 100 mg three times daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The study was designed to recruit 2200 patients, and the minimum duration of treatment would be 6 months. We did intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses; a post-hoc subgroup analysis was also done.

Findings

After we had recruited 1906 patients the trial was stopped early, because of an excess of deaths among patients in the ibopamine group. 232 (25%) of 953 patients in the ibopamine group died, compared with 193 (20%) of 953 patients in the placebo group (relative risk 1·26 [95% Cl 1·04–1·53], p=0·017). The average length of follow-up was 347 days in the ibopamine group and 363 days in the placebo group. In multivariate analysis, only the use of antiarrhythmic drugs at baseline was a significant independent predictor of increased fatality in ibopamine-treated patients.

Interpretation

Ibopamine seems to increase the risk of death among patients with advanced heart failure who are already receiving optimum therapy, but the reasons for this increase are not clear. Our finding that antiarrhythmic treatment was a significant predictor of increased mortality in ibopamine-treated patients may be important, but exploratory analyses must be interpreted with caution.

Introduction

In patients with advanced heart failure, the relief of symptoms is important. However, drugs such as milrinone, enoximone, and flosequinan have been shown to improve symptoms at the expense of an increase in fatality1, 3. Thus, evidence that a new drug improves the symptoms of heart failure is necessary but not sufficient for its acceptance into clinical use. Ideally, a new drug would increase survival and improve symptoms; at the least, it should have no effect on survival.

Dopamine agonists have properties that make them potentially useful for the treatment of heart failure. Ibopamine is an orally active compound hydrolysed in vivo to epinine (N-methyldopamine)4. The active metabolite stimulates DA-1 and DA-2 receptors and causes renal and peripheral vasodilatation, and does not seem to have an inotropic effect5. Previous studies showed that in patients with heart failure, ibopamine reduced plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, renin activity, and aldosterone6, 7, 8. Clinical studies have reported that ibopamine improves symptoms and has an effect similar to captopril on exercise tolerance in patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure9, 10. Ibopamine seemed to be a new class of drug that might make an important contribution to the management of patients with heart failure.

The Second Prospective Randomised Study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy (PRIME II Study) was set up to investigate the effect of ibopamine on mortality and to collect sufficient data to show whether or not ibopamine treatment was safe.

Fatality rates among patients with severe heart failure are high, even if they receive optimum treatment. The PRIME II study was specifically designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ibopamine in patients with advanced heart failure.

Section snippets

Methods

This multicentre, randomised study compared the effect of ibopamine 100 mg three times daily or placebo on all-cause mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Secondary endpoints were cause of death, the need for cardiac transplantation, the number of and reason for hospital admissions, quality of life, symptom scores, and reasons for withdrawal from trial medication.

Patients were randomly allocated ibopamine or placebo by means of a numbered pack system within each centre. Duration of

Results

The first patient was randomly assigned study medication in September, 1992. In August, 1995, the safety committee, at its regular meeting to review data then available, found a significantly higher fatality rate among ibopamine-treated patients than among placebo-treated patients. Thus, the safety committee advised the steering committee to terminate the study. All patients were subsequently withdrawn from treatment.

By August, 1995, we had recruited 1906 patients rather than the projected

Discussion

This is the fourth major study to report an association between active treatment and increased fatality in patients with heart failure1, 2, 3. Nevertheless, the adverse effect of ibopamine on survival reported here was unexpected. Ibopamine has properties expected to confer benefit to patients with heart failure, particularly vasodilatation and an appropriate effect on neurohormones, and is also thought not to have inotropic effects. The drug is well established in several European countries

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (332)

  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress-activated nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathway induces the upregulation of cardiomyocyte dopamine D1 receptor in heart failure

    2022, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
    Citation Excerpt :

    By contrast, the role for dopamine receptor, another endogenous catecholamine receptor that is widely distributed within the brain, was underexplored in the heart. Due to the inotropic and natriuretic effects, dopamine has been used to treat heart failure; however, dopamine receptor stimulation has been associated with more arrhythmias and increased mortality in patients with heart failure [8,9]. In our recent work, we demonstrated the role for cardiac dopamine receptor D1 (D1R) in the arrhythmogenesis in chronic heart failure [10].

  • Precision medicine for heart failure based on molecular mechanisms: The Research Achievement Award Lecture

    2021, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to its inotropic effects on the myocardium and direct natriuretic effects, dopamine has been used widely as a therapeutic drug for patients with acute heart failure [214]. A decade ago, however, a large clinical study demonstrated that the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure was worsened by treatment with dopamine receptor agonists and suggested that ventricular arrhythmia might be related to the poor prognosis of these patients [215–217]. We generated cardiomyocyte-specific D1R knockout and transgenic (overexpression) mice to show that the upregulation of cardiac D1R is both necessary and sufficient for triggering life-threatening ventricular arrythmia by driving dysregulated Ca2+ handling via hyperactivation of ryanodine receptor 2 in the failing heart, independent of cardiac function [213].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Members of PRIME II are listed at end of paper

View full text