Quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography measurements of stent strut apposition and tissue coverage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.204Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an intracoronary imaging modality has allowed accurate assessment of strut apposition and neointimal tissue coverage. This study set out to assess the inter and intraobserver variability of measurements of acute stent apposition and strut tissue coverage using OCT.

Methods

Thirty patients were studied (14 immediately after stent implantation and 16 during follow-up angiography [mean of 4.7 ±2.8 months]) using OCT (LightLab, Westford, Massachusetts, US). Data analysis was performed by 2 experienced observers. Struts were classified as “embedded", “protruding" or “malapposed" to the vessel well and recorded as percentage of total struts. Intimal coverage at follow-up was measured as the thickness of tissue covering each strut expressed in μm. Intra and interobserver variability was assessed by Bland-Altman plots and by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

An average of 3967 struts was examined by each observer and, overall, 53.7% of struts was embedded, 36.4% protruding and 9.9% malapposed. Low intraobserver variability for all measures of strut apposition was found, with repeatability coefficients that ranged between 5.1% and 9.3% and ICC exceeding 95% in all cases. Interobserver variability was also low (repeatability coefficients 6.6–10.8 and ICC > 91.3%). Mean intimal thickness in the follow-up group was 172.5 µm. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a low intraobserver and interobserver variability for intimal thickness, with repeatability coefficients 26.7 μm and 24.1 μm, respectively and ICC exceeding 98.6% for both.

Conclusions

Low intra and interobserver variability can be expected when analyzing OCT data for stent apposition and tissue coverage. This supports the validity of OCT as a clinical and research tool in the setting of intracoronary stent imaging.

Section snippets

Methods

A total of 30 patients were prospectively included in this study. OCT was performed immediately after stent deployment in 14 patients and on follow-up angiography in a separate group of 16 patients, using the LightLab system (Westford, Massachusetts, US). Blood clearance was achieved using a proximal occlusion balloon (Helios, Goodman, Japan) with intra-coronary flush of lactated Ringer's solution through the end-hole of the balloon catheter (flow rate 0.6–0.9 ml/s) during simultaneous image

Acute stent strut apposition

Clinical and angiographic and procedural characteristics of the 14 patients having OCT immediately following stent implantation are shown in Table 1. The target vessel was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 50%, left circumflex artery (LCx) in 21.4% and the right coronary artery (RCA) in 28.6%. OCT was performed uneventfully in all cases.

A mean of 3930 struts were examined by observer 1 and 4042 by observer 2. The average percent embedded, protruding and malapposed struts for observer

Discussion

This is the first systematic study to evaluate inter and intra-observer variability for both acute stent apposition and late tissue stent strut coverage using OCT. With its high resolution, OCT permits a detailed assessment of coronary structures while giving unique insights into tissue responses following stent implantation. Our study shows that OCT analysis gives highly reproducible data for both the assessment of acute stent strut apposition and late strut tissue coverage.

Conclusions

Low intra and interobserver variability can be expected when analyzing intracoronary derived OCT data for stent strut apposition and intimal coverage. This supports the validity of OCT as a clinical and research tool in the setting of intracoronary stent imaging.

Acknowledgement

The authors of this manuscript have certified that they comply with the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology [21].

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • The Effect of Stent Artefact on Quantification of Plaque Features Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): A Feasibility and Clinical Utility Study

    2020, Heart Lung and Circulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although the application of OCT for examining plaque features is well established, there is a gap in the existing knowledge on two important issues. Firstly, OCT in clinical practice is commonly performed only post stenting to optimise percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results [5,6]. Plaque features behind struts are routinely excluded from the analysis of OCT registries aimed at examining clinical and procedural outcomes [7].

  • ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: A comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance

    2014, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
    Citation Excerpt :

    For analysis of the BVS, which are transparent to the near-infrared light of the OCT catheter, incomplete strut apposition (ISA) was defined as presence of struts separated from the underlying vessel wall (7). For metal DES, inducing posterior dropout, struts were considered malapposed when the axial distance between the strut's surface and the luminal surface was greater than the strut thickness (11). Tissue prolapse was defined as the presence of tissue protruding between stent struts extending into the lumen as a circular arc connecting adjacent struts (4).

  • Optical coherence tomography characteristics of in-stent restenosis are different between first and second generation drug eluting stents

    2014, IJC Heart and Vessels
    Citation Excerpt :

    Hence, in the presence of the well defined neo-atherosclerotic features reported above, we classified the ISR as neo-atherosclerosis, while we defined the heterogeneous group as those with an ISR optical pattern which was neither homogeneous nor neoatherosclerotic tissue. Furthermore, in all lesions we identified the presence of: microvessels, low backscattering structure with a diameter < 200 μm; peri-strut low intensity area (PSLIA) defined as a region around stent struts with homogenous lower intensity than surrounding tissue, without signal attenuation (24); malapposed struts, when the axial distance from DES strut to the luminal surface was longer than the strut/polymer thickness (25), excluding bifurcations; and uncovered struts, NIH thickness equal to 0 μm (26). The decision to perform a dilatation before proceeding to OCT acquisition was left to the operator's discretion on the basis of the angiographic findings.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text