Elsevier

The Journal of Pediatrics

Volume 152, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 160-164.e13
The Journal of Pediatrics

Original article
Defining the Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Will the Real Definition Please Stand Up?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.07.056Get rights and content

Objectives

To review the use of definitions of the metabolic syndrome in studies of children and adolescents and to review results from studies that used factor analysis to examine structure among cardiometabolic variables.

Study design

Literature review.

Results

In 27 publications, authors used 40 unique definitions of the metabolic syndrome. Most of these definitions were adaptations of the adult definition developed by the National Cholesterol Education Program. In 11 studies that used exploratory factor analysis, the number of components ranged from 5 to 19, and the number of factors identified ranged from 1 to 5.

Conclusions

The use of multiple definitions of the metabolic syndrome argues strongly for the development of a standard pediatric definition.

Section snippets

Methods

We used PUBMED to look for studies, conducted among children and adolescents subsequent to the release of the WHO definition of the metabolic syndrome in 1998, in which the metabolic syndrome was defined or in which factor analysis was used to examine the underlying structure among a set of cardiometabolic factors. Additional studies were identified by reviewing cited reference in retrieved publications and by reviewing the authors’ personal files.

For publications of definitions of the

Definitions in Current Use

We found at least 27 articles with 46 definitions of the metabolic syndrome, most of them unique (Table I, Part A, Table I, Part B, Table I, Part C, Table I, Part D, Table I, Part E, Table I, Part F; available at www.jpeds.com).11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 A few studies applied adult definitions to the young participants.18, 20, 35 Twenty-eight emulated the NCEP model, 9 the WHO model, 3 the EGIR model, 1 the American

Discussion

Our review shows a proliferation of definitions of the metabolic syndrome used in studies of children and adolescents in recent years. Although many studies opted to develop a definition with a similar approach, usually the NCEP one, studies rarely used identical definitions. The most commonly used definition was the one published by Cook et al.13, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 Many studies included a core set of variables (anthropometric measures, concentrations of lipids, blood pressure, and glucose),

References (74)

  • N. Ravaja et al.

    Life changes, locus of control and metabolic syndrome precursors in adolescents and young adults: a three-year follow-up

    Soc Sci Med

    (1996)
  • R. Retnakaran et al.

    Nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors in pediatric metabolic syndrome

    J Pediatr

    (2006)
  • C.L. Braunschweig et al.

    Obesity and risk factors for the metabolic syndrome among low-income, urban, African American schoolchildren: the rule rather than the exception?

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2005)
  • J.R. Fernandez et al.

    Waist circumference percentiles in nationally representative samples of African-American, European-American, and Mexican-American children and adolescents

    J Pediatr

    (2004)
  • E. Kylin

    Studien ueber das hypertonie-hypeglykämie-hyperurikämiesyndrom

    Zentralblatt fuer Innere Medizin

    (1923)
  • G.M. Reaven

    Banting lecture 1988Role of insulin resistance in human disease

    Diabetes

    (1988)
  • K.G. Alberti et al.

    Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complicationsPart 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation

    Diabet Med

    (1998)
  • Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications

    (1999)
  • B. Balkau et al.

    Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultationEuropean Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR)

    Diabet Med

    (1999)
  • Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • S.M. Grundy et al.

    Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement

    Circulation

    (2005)
  • D. Einhorn et al.

    American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance syndrome

    Endocrinol Pract

    (2003)
  • Z.T. Bloomgarden

    Definitions of the insulin resistance syndrome: the 1st World Congress on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. 2005

  • A. Bavdekar et al.

    Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old Indian children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both?

    Diabetes

    (1999)
  • K. Torok et al.

    Low physical performance in obese adolescent boys with metabolic syndrome

    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

    (2001)
  • S. Cook et al.

    Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2003)
  • M.L. Cruz et al.

    The metabolic syndrome in overweight Hispanic youth and the role of insulin sensitivity

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2004)
  • R. Weiss et al.

    Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • M. Lambert et al.

    Insulin resistance syndrome in a representative sample of children and adolescents from Quebec, Canada

    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord

    (2004)
  • S.D. de Ferranti et al.

    Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in American adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • M. Rodriguez-Moran et al.

    Metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents aged 10-18 years

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • E. Papadopoulou-Alataki et al.

    Clinical and biochemical manifestations of syndrome X in obese children

    Eur J Pediatr

    (2004)
  • Y. Ogawa et al.

    Usefulness of serum adiponectin level as a diagnostic marker of metabolic syndrome in obese Japanese children

    Hypertens Res

    (2005)
  • R.M. Viner et al.

    Prevalence of the insulin resistance syndrome in obesity

    Arch Dis Child

    (2005)
  • C.M. Boney et al.

    Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • R.C. da Silva et al.

    Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in normal glucose tolerant Brazilian adolescents with family history of type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2005)
  • Cited by (256)

    • Intrauterine malnutrition and future risk of metabolic syndrome

      2023, Metabolic Syndrome: From Mechanisms to Interventions
    • Global, regional, and country estimates of metabolic syndrome burden in children and adolescents in 2020: a systematic review and modelling analysis

      2022, The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      We reported prevalence estimates considering the context-specific and adapted version of the diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome definition by Ford and colleagues.13,22 In the population of interest, with a high prevalence of dyslipidaemia and a lower prevalence of abdominal obesity and hyperglycaemia, the recommendation for diagnosing metabolic syndrome was per Ford and colleagues' definition.13,22,23 Two components of the definition were adapted for countries or regions, to limit heterogeneity of diagnosis across regions: high blood pressure (systolic or diastolic blood pressure ≥90th percentile for age, sex, and height) and waist circumference (in at least the 90th centile for age, sex, and ethnic group).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    View full text